新华社果然强大:一篇评论让美国人民纷纷倒戈

(翻译的话:新华社太有存在感了,这帖子有一千多条回复,我还没准备牺牲,所以就按照受欢迎程度翻译了最前面的一部分,美国人民反战呼声还是很高的~~~~~~~~~)

北京(路透社)— 中国官方媒体新华社周二报道称,武装打击叙利亚是非常危险和不负责任的举动,世界应该记住由于美国断言其拥有大规模杀伤性武器而发动的伊拉克战争,最后被证明是个错误。

美国正式知会叙利亚总统阿萨德说,它相信阿萨德应该为上周发生的,针对平民的化学武器攻击行为负责。

来自美国以及欧洲和中东的盟国的军事首领们在约旦聚首,可能参加一个军事会议,决定他们是否要惩罚阿萨德,阿萨德否认使用了化学武器,并将这次袭击归罪于叛军。

新华社说,西方各国对于到底是哪一方使用了化学武器这个问题,在联合国调查人员得出结果前,就急匆匆的下结论。

“这样的言辞,以及最近华盛顿与其盟友间的一系列磋商行为,表示他们已经拉弓上箭,即使没有联合国的授权,他们也会把这支箭射出去。”

“这是不负责任和危险的行为。首先,目前的方案会让人想起伊拉克战争的起因,美国对伊拉克提出了大杀器的指控,而随后这被证明是错误的。”

新华社的评论并不等同于政府声明,但是它们能被解读为中国官方考虑的反映。

中国已经敦促各方,不要妄加揣测联合国的调查结果,呼吁冷静处理这些指控。

“在这场危机最激烈的时刻,各方应该保持头脑冷静,尤其是那些不耐烦,在没有联合国许可的情况下,想采取军事行动的国家,”它说道。

“当务之急是美国及与其志同道合的那些国家,避免草率地发表战争声明,而是让联合国发挥应有的作用,决定对此情况,如何采取相应的行动。”

阿萨德的主要盟友和武器供应者俄罗斯说,叛军可能就躲在这次袭击的幕后,并且其敦促华盛顿不要使用武力来推翻阿萨德。

莫斯科和北京,在之前西方各国为促使联合国出面惩罚阿萨德而发起的投票活动中,均投了否决票。

但中国一直热衷于向大家表示,她不偏袒任何一方,且敦促叙利亚政府与反对派举行会谈以采取一些措施以满足****的需要。她也表示过,应成立一个过渡政府。

美国网民纷纷呼应:

Mike 16 hours ago 2 120

and apparently, telling the truth to thepublic makes you a traitor. only in the US.

More

显然,告诉人们真相会让你变成一个叛徒,这一情况只会发生在美国。

Jose 13 hours ago 6 1

There hasnt been any truth coming from theright since MLK died

自从马丁·路德·金死去后,那儿再也没有来自于右派的真相。

Nathan 12 hours ago 1 6

Or from the left Jose. Our country wouldcease to operate if our government started telling the people the truth.

楼上的,或者也没有来自于左派的真相。如果我们的政府开始告诉人们真相,我们的国家就会停止运作。

Old SOB 11 hours ago 0 4

It is unfortunate that Americans agree withthe Chinese. Our own government can not be trusted to tell the truth aboutANYTHING! The constant LIES and distortions coming out of the mouth of ourpresident is like watching a mafia movie. Oh wait, Obama IS from Chicago so we AREwatching a mafia movie!

不幸的是,美国人民同意中国人的说法。我们自己的政府说的关系任何事情的真相都得不到人民的信任!从我们的总统先生口中说出来的持续不断的谎言和扭曲的说法,让我们就像在看一场黑帮电影。哦,等等,奥巴马真的来自于芝加哥哦,因此我们确实是在看一场黑帮电影!

michael r. 11 hours ago 0 1

The truth shall set U free.......

真相会让你获得自由。。。。

George 10 hours ago 0 4

The American people are the biggest threatto the American Government.

美国人民是美国政府的最大的威胁。

DaveS 5 hours ago 0 1

George, I totally agree with your statement. The sad part is that theAmerican people continue to make the same mistake over and over again byelecting the same idiots over and over again and expecting the thoughtprocesses of the elected officials to somehow change. It is time to clean outCongress at the ballot box and start over new. If something isn't done in thenear future, the United Stateswill suffer what has happened to several countries in the Middle East. We will have our "American Sparing"!!!!

George,我完全同意你的说法。不幸的是,美国人民继续一遍又一遍地犯着同样的错误,即一遍又一遍地推选出同样的白痴,然后期待着这些民选政客的思维方式能作出一些改变。时候在投票箱里清理国会了,重新开始新的。如果在不久的将来,我们不做些什么,美国将会发生一些在中东几个国家发生的那些事情。我们将有我们自己的“保护美国”!!!

Scilynt 16 hours ago 11 286

Wouldn't it be nice if our governmentactually asked us, the citizens, if we were ok with starting a war...you know,since it's us that have to do the fighting, deal with the loss and other majorconsequences. I'm patriotic but I do not support yet another war for no damnreason. Don't enough of the worlds countries already hate us enough?

如果我们的政府真的问我们,公民们,我们发动一场战争怎么样,这可不妙。。。你知道的,因为这是我们不得不与之战斗的东西,处理战损和其他主要后果。我爱国,但是如果没有切实地该死的原因,我不会支持另一场战争。难道还嫌世界上其他国家恨我们美国不够么?

Ron 17 hours ago 0 8

You forgot one thing,Its the Americantaxpayer that has to pay for it.

你还忘记了一件事情,美国纳税人不得不承担这笔费用。

Kiwicowboy 17 hours ago 0 16

You are assuming the government representsthe people. Politicians only do what their masters want, regardless of howdetrimental it is to the majority of the people.

你正在假设政府是代表人民的。政客们是能做那些他们主子想要他们做的事,不管这些事情对大部分的民众来说有多么的不利。

Bill 17 hours ago 3 10

A declaration of war was necessary untilthe Patriot Act, demanded congressional approval, now it is the soul decisionof the President who apparently seems to not give a da*n what the publicthinks. The people killed by this horrible weapon are dead, they are going tostill be dead in a month a year a century, I can't understand the rush? Assadif guilty, will be a criminal regardless, killing your own people is losing bywinning. How does any governing body survive without the labor and money of itssubjects. Tyrants are assassinated all through history by those they rule, whyare we getting involved?

在爱国者法案得到国会批准前,宣战是必要的。现在它是这个明显不在乎公众想法的总统自己内心作出的决定。被这种可怕武器杀害的人已经死了,一个月,一年,一个世纪,他们仍旧死而不能复生,我就不能理解,为啥这么急急忙忙(地做决定)?阿萨德如果有罪,无论如何将被定罪,杀害自己的人民会失去获胜的机会。任何管理机构如何才能在失去它的劳力和金钱的情况下,继续维持下去?历史上的暴君,从来都是被那些他统治的民众刺杀的,为啥我们要搅合进去?

Al B 17 hours ago 0 0

Watch "How Nations Die" on Ytube,if you wonder how we ever got to this point.

如果你想知道我们怎么走到这一步的,去Youtube上看看“国家如何灭亡”吧。

Bob L 17 hours ago 0 3

Hey, Scilynt...that'swhat they are supposed to do...it is called the "consent ofcongress"....but somehow, that law...like many others, are no longerfollowed....

你好,Scilynt。。。这是他们应该做的。。。这被称为“国会授权”。。。但是莫名其妙,法律。。。像很多其他的一样,不再被遵循。

本文内容于 2013/8/31 13:08:35 被子墨青衫编辑

猜你感兴趣

更多 >>

评论

评 论

热门评论

美国政府代表美国人民的民意吗?别天真了,美国政府代表的是军火商和大资本家的利益,如果你是中产阶级(其实就是我们说的无产阶级),哪凉儿快哪儿呆着去。

‘你正在假设政府是代表人民的。政客们是能做那些他们主子想要他们做的事,不管这些事情对大部分的民众来说有多么的不利’

连美国人都不相信自己的民主制度,国内有一些人还对此深信不疑。可笑!


中国网民和美国网民一样。

就是宁愿相信对方国家的宣传也不相信自己的政府。


15楼tyrax

米:老子要宰了你!叙:WHY?!

米:你牙咬了你舌!属于恐怖暴力!老子不允许!

叙:你咬了自己谁管?!

米:到时我又规定全世界给老子出慰问金!

叙:&*……%》?@#


Cyriacus 17 hours ago 7 1

So we should have asked citizens beforefinally attacking Germanyin WWII all the while they were gassing millions.

那么当德国人用毒气杀害几百万人时,在我们二战对德国发起最终的攻击时,我们都应该先问问公民么?

Diogenes of the 'burgh 16 hours ago 2 4

VERY sad, but true. We never should havegotten involved in the middle east. The only place we should have attacked was Benghazi after theykilled our Ambassador. Still cant believe we let that SLIDE! That was done tous because of the hatred our meddling under the bush administrations inspired.

We should pull out of the countries wherethe majority of people dont want us. We have enough ships to maintain amilitary presence everywhere. WITHOUT turning friends into enemies.( when theRussians were oppressing Afghanistanwe had taliban leaders over for tea to the White House!

真伤心,但是确实事实。我们从来不应该搅合进中东的事务。在他们杀死我们的大使后,我们唯一应该进行攻击的地方就是班加西。到现在我仍不能相信,我们就让这事就这么过去了!之所以这么对我们,是因为他们恨我们在布什政权的授意下,对他们进行干预。

我们应该从那些大多数人民都不欢迎我们的地方抽身离开。我们有足够多的船舰在全世界维持我们的军事存在。不要将朋友变成敌人。(当俄罗斯压迫阿富汗的时候,我们和塔利班领导人在白宫喝茶呢!)

John 16 hours ago 7 0

lets say for arguments sake that we donothing and because we did nothing this Assad idiot decides hey i can use thesenow let me fire them into Israel or Jordan or somewhere else ... the price ofgas goes up to 10 dollars a gallon then you'll be on ******* commenting on why isgas so expensive etc etc etc. We forget that this is against international lawand the international community is on-board with this so it will be a littledifferent then Iraq

就让我们说,由于有争议,所以我们啥都不会做。因为我们的不作为,阿萨德这个白痴会决定说,嗨,我能使用这些东西了,让我用这些武器向以色列或约旦或其他地方开火。。。。当汽油的价格上升到10美元一加仑,你就会在雅虎评论说为什么汽油这么贵啊之类的。我们忘记了这有违国际法,国际法已经开始着手处理这一切,因此这会与之前的伊拉克有所不同。

Chaos 16 hours ago 0 0

i don't hate the people, just thegovernment agencies, their info theft and the military, not the soldiers whoare just kids shooting at other kids doing as they are told, but i hate theofficers, the generals, all those who encourage war for gain of power andcontrol claiming it is for our safety.

我不讨厌人民,我只讨厌政府机构,他们偷窃信息。并且我讨厌军队,而不是讨厌士兵,他们只是被告知射杀其他孩子的一群孩子。但是我讨厌官员,将军,以及所有那些声称是为了我们的安全,而实际是为了获得权力或控制权才鼓励战争的人。

dojolaser 16 hours ago 1 0

why would they "asked" youanything...just asking...

他们为什么要啥事都“征询”你的意见。。。他们只是要求。。。

Chaos 16 hours ago 1 2

my dad taught me America was the best country in theworld, but i can see that has changed since then.

我老爸告诉我,美国是这个世界上最棒的国家,但是我能看到,从那以后,事情发生了改变。

Jay 16 hours ago 3 0

The US played an off hands approachleading up to WWII and look what happened.. a world war where tens of millionsof people were killed. Since WWII, the US and allies have taken aproactive stance around the world to secure our freedom and act as a pacifierand world police. This has resulted in statistically less deaths caused by warthan in recorded history. Historically, the world has never been as peaceful asit is now. You can look up the stats, but prior to the 19th century, for every100k people, battles killed around 500 people. In the 20th century, with 2world wars, it was only 60 per 100k. Now it is down to around 3 people forevery 100k. So as technology progressed, civilization developed, and having ahands on approach to shaping the world as the sole superpower, the world hasnever been as peaceful as it is now. So Starting "another war for no damnreason" is a simplistic view of the matter.

二战前,美国采取随意的态度,你们看看发生了什么。。一场成千上万人死去的世界大战。二战以来,美国及其盟友在全球范围内采取着主动的态度以保护我们的自由,扮演者调节者和世界警察的角色。这使得死于战争的人的统计数据少于历史记录。历史上来看,世界从未像现在这样平静。你可以去查数据,但是在19世纪以前,每十万个人里面,就大约有500个人死于战乱。到了20世纪,在两场世界大战里面,每十万人只有60个人死于战乱。现在则下降至每十万人中,只有3人左右,死于战乱。因此,随着技术的发展,文明的进步,随着单极世界的形成,世界从来没有像现在这样平静过。因此“没有该死的原因就发动另一场战争”,是对这个问题的一种简单的观点。

William C 16 hours ago 0 1

I would prefer people with information makethe decision versus the population.

比起全员决定,我更倾向于有着足够信息的人做出决定。

Victoria15 hours ago 1 0

you give the general population way toomuch credit

你给予广大人民群众太多信任。

Marc 15 hours ago 0 5

William, we see how well that has worked so far...

William,我们能看到,到目前为止,那样做的效果。。。

Radman 15 hours ago 2 0

Hey man...we're all just listening to ourIsraeli masters. Don't blame us for thinking.

Hi。。。我们只是听命于我们的以色列主子。不要因为这个责怪我们。

RoyP 15 hours ago 0 1

Really John, is that what you believe isgoing to happen, that Assad will attack Isreal, a country loaded with NuclearWeapons. You sound like Washingtonfear mongers. That is the most absurd thing I have ever heard. They aren't evensure if the guy used Chemical weapons yet. Tell me John, are you one of thosepeople who still believe that Iraqhad WMDs and moved them to Syria?

真的么?John,这就是你认为会要发生的事情么,阿萨德将攻击以色列,一个有着核武器的国家。你听起来就像是华盛顿的恐惧传播者。这是我听到过的最荒谬的事情。他们甚至还不确定,是不是这家伙使用的化学武器。告诉我,John,你是不是那些仍相信伊拉克有着大杀器,并将这些大杀器转移到叙利亚境内的人之一?

RoyP 14 hours ago 0 1

Jay, you are out of your mind. Have Vietnam and Iraq taught you nothing? We didn'tbelong in either of those wars, they were both about making a few people evenricher than they already were. WWII was something people wanted to stay out of,yes, and we did belong in the war, no doubt, but you need to assess each andevery war accordingly, and if you think that our actions in Vietnam and Iraq did anything for the world youare simply dillusional.

Jay,你真是疯了。越南和伊拉克没有教会你什么东西么?我们不应归入那些战争,这些战争都使得一般子有钱人变得更富有而已。二战是一些人想置身事外,是的,我们参与战争,毫无疑问,但你需要相应地评估每一场战争,如果你考虑一下我们在越南和伊拉克的行动,为世界做了贡献,那你就是在幻想。

me tooooo 14 hours ago 0 0

Jay, your statistics what you want to believe. But keep in mind, thereare far more 100K person groups now than there were pre-WWII. So, even if thesame number of people are killed, it would look like less...something to thinkabout with statistics, we can make them prove anything we want them to believe.

Now, as for our intervention, there shouldbe none, but our hypocrite in the White House has now placed us in a positionwhere we have to, because of his and that idiot Kerry's comments. At least whenwe went into Iraq,there was months of evidence and conviening, now, it only takes a week to investigate...

Jay,你统计你想相信的东西。但请记住,现在比起二战前,人口更多些。因此,即使同样数量的人被杀死,它看上去也要少些。。。。考虑下这些统计数据,我们能让它们证明任何我们想要他们相信的事。

现在,至于我们的调停,应该是没有的,但是白宫中的那个伪君子已经将我们置于一个身不由己的位置,就因为他和那个白痴克里的评论。至少,当我们进入伊拉克的时候,是经历数月的收集证据和召集人马后,而现在,只花了一个礼拜来调查。。。。。

The True Yahwhoian 14 hours ago 0 0

My guess would be that the CIA was alreadyin there instigating and whispering that if a Syrian "spring" werestarted, the U.S would be right behind with covert weapons and support if notovert. So this small group started it, and maybe half the Syrian people wereall for it - but half is not enough for a revolution. It's just enough tocreate a bloody 50/50 mess, that's what you've got. And of course things didn'tpan out exactly the way the whispers said they would. Obama wants to send insome missiles now to help them out, and not have America be seen turning it's back,yet again, on another failed plot.

我猜没准CIA已经在那里进行煽动,窃窃私语地说,是否“叙利亚之春”已经开始,如果没有公开,美国会拿着秘密武器躲在后面以及提供支持。因此,这个小组开始了它的秘密任务,也许一半的叙利亚人都为它服务,但一般人还不足以闹革命。它只够创造出一种混乱的流血冲突,那就是你会得到的结果。当然事情不会向着这群窃窃私语者所说的那样成功发展。奥巴马现在想发射一些导弹来帮助他们,且不会让美国被看到是从另一场不成功的阴谋上转过身来的。


更多精彩内容