翻译文:中国和澳大利亚打一仗到底谁会胜利!

天涯一剑侠 收藏 6 282
导读: [img]http://img9.itiexue.net/1295/12959385.jpg[/img] 这是澳大利亚论坛里的贴子 War China vs Australia, Who will win? 中国和澳大利亚打,谁会赢? 注:[]里内容表示为引用上面某人的话 ――――――――――――――――――――――――――― 网民评论: Andrew Australia Whichever tries to invade the other will


翻译文:中国和澳大利亚打一仗到底谁会胜利!

这是澳大利亚论坛里的贴子


War China vs Australia, Who will win?


中国和澳大利亚打,谁会赢?


注:[]里内容表示为引用上面某人的话


―――――――――――――――――――――――――――


网民评论:


Andrew


Australia


Whichever tries to invade the other will lose. The home ground advantage is worth 50 divisions on its own. China has more people. Australia has more money per capita and much better technology. In terms of military spending - China $US 61,036,400,000, Australia $US 24,802,000,000. For one to invade the other they need to transport a big enough army across the sea. Neither side has enough ships, and even if they did ships are hard to replace and vulnerable to attack by cheap weapons from the air (something the Japanese discovered in the second world war).


不管哪个国家,想要侵略其它国家的,都会输。主场优势值50个部门。中国人比较多。澳大利亚人均钱比较多,还有更好的科技。在军事开支方面,中国61,036,400,000美元,澳大利亚24,802,000,000美元。一个去侵略另一个,需要横跨海洋运送大量的军队。哪一方都没有足够的船舶,而且,即使他们有那么多船,也很难替换,很容易就会被那些很廉价的空中武器打击(像在二战时日本发现的那些东东)。


――――――――――――――――――――――――――


Ngali


Perth


Andrew wrote:


Whichever tries to invade the other will lose. The home ground advantage is worth 50 divisions on its own. China has more people. Australia has more money per capita and much better technology.




Andrew, you’’ve got to be joking. Even more than usual.


There’’s only the slightest of homeground advantages to be had against one of the world’’s largest armies.


And a wealth per capita ratio is almost meaningless with a 1 billion difference in populations. Besides what does it matter that Australians have two cars and a flat screen when we’’re talking about the comparative economic capabilities of nations?


Similarly the level of technology (and I’’m not sure that we have the upper hand there) of the military will only yield a slight advantage when overwhelmingly outnumbered.


Yeah that’’s not an unreasonable assessment. The logistics of getting to Australia by ship would be difficult - but I’’d imagine the easiest route would be through SEA as per the Japanese example.


Then it’’s game over.


[引用Andrew


不管哪个国家,想要侵略其它国家的,都会输。主场优势值50个部门。中国人比较多。澳大利亚人均钱比较多,还有更好的科技。]


Andrew,你肯定是说笑吧。比平时还更搞笑。


对抗世界上最大的军队,主场优势没什么重要的。


还有,对于在人口上有10亿之别的两个国家,人均财富也几乎没啥意义。除此之外,还有,说到对手的国家经济实力,澳大利亚人有2部车和一个平面屏幕,这个也要紧?


同样,当对方在数量上有压倒性的优势时,军事技术水平(我不确定我们是不是在这方面占上风)只有一点点优势。


对,也许这不是一个合理的评估。到澳大利亚的船运后勤会有困难,但我想,最容易的航线是,像日本人那样横穿海洋。


然后,游戏就玩完了。


2
回复主贴
聚焦 国际 历史 社会 军事

猜你感兴趣

更多 >>
6条评论
点击加载更多

发表评论

更多精彩内容

热门话题

更多
广告 这才叫游戏:仅13天风靡全球场面堪比战争大片
发帖 向上 向下
广告 关闭